Squares of Differences: subtraction practice toward a greater purpose
April 27, 2011Here is a phenomenal lesson, accessible to any child who knows how to subtract, and compelling to everyone, up to and including professional mathematicians. Get a kid engaged in it, and theyโll do hundreds of subtraction problems without complaint, because itโs helping them solve an honest mathematical mystery. Iโve seen this idea discussed in math education circles, but I havenโt found any references to it online, so I want to share it here.
UPDATE! I’m adding in a video because the original images in this post were lost at some point. This will help make the lesson below make more sense.
Squares of Differences
Hereโs the game: draw a square, and pick four numbers to go in each of the corners.
Once youโve done that, put a dot on the midpoint of each side, and find the positive difference between the numbers on the closest corner.
Now connect the midpoints.
Lo and behold, youโve got yourself another square! Which means you can repeat the processโฆ
And then you keep going untilโฆ
there are no surprises ahead. In this case, we have zeroes showing up in the middle square, so there will continue to be zeroes forever.
At this point, this is purely a fun little exploration (that happens to involve about 20-30 one digit subtraction problems), and you and your child/students should try a few of these out. I recommend starting with one digit numbers while youโre getting the hang of it, but there are no real restrictions other than the instructions above. But once you do a few, youโll start to notice somethingโฆ you always seem to end up with a square of zeroes in the center.
And now weโre ready to ask the some serious questions, and pose some real challenges.
- Will this game always end with a square of zeroes in the center?
- Whatโs the most number of steps you can go before arriving at a square of zeroes?
My students generally count each square past the first one as being a โstep.โ The example above ends at step 7.
From a pedagogical perspective, hereโs whatโs cool about this problem: the challenge it is immediately engaging, and allows immediate entrance into the problem. Kids can get started right away, and by the time theyโve tried 4 or 5 squares, theyโve done a hundred or more subtraction problems. So theyโre practicing a skill, but in a context where itโs motivated; they need subtraction to see if they can get more steps in their square of differences. But also, they can choose numbers that make this problem as easy or as hard as they need it to be. For example, you could put two digit, three digit, or 10 digit numbers in your starting square. You could also try fractions (or even irrational numbers!). So suddenly long subtraction, decimal subtraction, or differences of fractions becomes something a student needs to figure out (if they donโt already know it). Itโs either great practice, or itโs motivation to learn something new.
They can also try out different strategies. What matters here? Some of my students thought that maybe using odd versus even numbers would make a difference (what happens if you use all odds? All evens?). Some others thought that using prime numbers would be the secret, while others had a hunch that using powers of 10 (1, 10, 100, 1000) would be the key. Should you try using a zero at the beginning?
Testing strategies also keys you in to important pieces of the mechanics at play. For example, one of my students noticed that if all the numbers on a square increase by one, you still get the same numbers at the next step. So the square with {1, 4, 6, 9} would give the same next step as the square with {2, 5, 7, 10}, or {3, 6, 8, 11} for that matter. Getting into the habit of noticing behavior like this is a critical habit to develop for the budding mathematician.
So thatโs phase one of this lesson. Whatโs beautiful is that the kids will almost certainly usher in the next phases, because there are questions waiting to be asked, extensions to this problem just dying to be made. (See a good extension or question? Let me know in the comments.)
If you try this lesson out, tell me how it goes. Later, Iโll provide another post with my own favorite directions about where to go with it from here.
UPDATE: To read Squares of Differences II, check out the next blog post in this series.
We tried other shapes and rather than getting to zeros we got to interesting loops of repeating numbers. We’re wondering what makes the square special for this, but aren’t sure how to take that question further.
I haven’t explored this as far as I’d need to to know where to guide you next. The loops are interesting, though, and represent their own “end.” I wonder if powers of 2 are the shapes that will end in zeroes – have you tried octagons?
Is there a video for this? Sincerely not sure if I’m playing it correctly. Once you connect the midpoints you create 3 more squares so how do you decide what the positive difference is or should be for the centre where the squares meet?
Some of the original images in that blog post got corrupted at some point. But yes – there’s a video here: https://youtu.be/pk1zwq1xLq4
And an updated blog post about diffy squares here: https://mathforlove.com/2020/03/diffy-squares/
I hope that helps!
Very helpful! I didn’t realize the inner squares became diagonal to the original square and so I had competing grids that got super confusing. Thanks so much!
The images are really key ๐